3.23.2005

A moral pornucopia: When Janet Jackson's bejeweled boob made an abrupt appearance at the 2004 Super Bowl, "moral values" guardians like Tom Delay, Joe Lieberman, and Rep. Heather Wilson (R-NM) shrieked the loudest. Aware that Fortune 500 companies use seedy low-profile subsidiaries to expand profits, Wilson exploded at Viacom president Mel Karmazin during decency hearings on Nipplegate. Her voice reportedly cracking and eyes filling with tears, she said: "You knew what you were doing. You knew that shock and indecency creates a buzz that moves market share and lines your pockets." But according to a new report by Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW), shock and indecency also moves political campaigns.

An ardent anti-porn crusader, Wilson has accepted $47,000 in contributions from smut-related industries in the last two election cycles—and she’s not alone. CREW’s report spotlights the top 15 anti-porn Congresspeople—13 Republicans and 2 Democrats—who received at least ten grand from companies profiting from adult entertainment. These contributions come from hotels (an industry that makes $190 million a year in pay-per-view adult entertainment sales), cable and satellite companies (corporations that rake in $1 billion annually on pay-per-view and video-on-demand programming with adult content), phone companies and internet providers (AT&T alone made $20 million a month on broadband porn offerings in 2002). CREW's executive director suggests a new prize, the "Forked Tongue Awards," for people like Sen. Sam Brownback, a Republican who received $17,000 in donations from an industry he equates with cocaine peddlers, and John McCain, who positioned himself as the anti-porn candidate in the 2000 presidential election but went on to collect $46,000 from smut-related companies. That prominent conservative Republicans who tsk-tsk the widespread availability of naughty content raked in the most—DeLay ($24,000), Charles Pickering ($52,000), Fred Upton of Michigan ($56,500)—begs an obvious question: when will American voters stop rewarding "moral values" hypocrites? Or, better yet, when will they stop rewarding cynics: these Congresspeople seem convinced that voters won't make the connection, just as the veil between major corporations’ smily-face public images and their backdoor profit centers will never be torn down by the media, the companies, or, least of all, politicos themselves, who are most likely to benefit.

No comments: